Blindness



Downloads:

Download in DVD format ($4.99) Download in DivX format ($2.99) Download in PDA format ($1.99) 

Download Blindness movie

Attention!
Today you can get access to all our movies only for $0.99 per day.
Create free account and make sure that it is true.

Vivian Wu Natalie
Joe Lando Patrick
Chin Han Daniel Hong
Lisa Lu Mrs. Hong

205 Comments »

    Pages: [41] 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 311 » Show All

  • Absurd and stupid movie

    If you want to see a good movie about how humans become animals when
    society breaks down, go see Lord of the Flies
    (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0057261/). This movie is a protracted,
    boring and stupid rehash of the same idea with no originality, no
    redeeming values, nothing. And I don't know about the screenwriter, but
    if you suddenly find yourself blind, would you just declare to people
    that "I am blind" as if it had been the case forever? Or would you tell
    people that you had become blind or that you could suddenly not see
    anything? Implausible storyline, bad screen writing, incomprehensible
    ending… I could go on and on, but you get the idea. Avoid the movie
    if you can.

    balajiramanathan from United States - 25 June 2009
  • Starts out VERY good…

    Yes, I loved the first 30 minutes of this film. It seemed very
    intelligent and exciting. But from the point where they get locked up
    in a former mental institution things start to get bad both plot wise
    and logical flaws wise.Rather early in the institution you get the feeling that there is a
    very strong urge to show how complicated we humans can be..how blind
    etc. That is all good in itself. But when the plot goes in the certain
    direction that it does, it has to jump a hoop of logical flaws and
    psychological flaws to get to the point it so desperately wants us to
    see.The movie in the end comes off as naive…sadly. It could have been so
    much better if it hadn't been so desperate to get to the ugly or
    beautiful parts. I really hope the book is better…You might think…oh but there weren't many logical flaws in this film?
    Yes there are…you just have to think a bit.This seems like a film that Michael Haneke could have done way better.

    Golgothae from Norway - 22 June 2009
  • Sucks and it sucks bad

    Thank God I rented the movie. I would be even more disappointed if I
    had paid more money and watched it on the movies. I cannot believe
    Juliane Moore was on a movie like that. It's non-sense, ridiculous.
    This only confirms my theory that Brazilian directors really shouldn't
    be in the movie business. This was just another proof for me. Meirelles
    was able to make this movie the worst that many people has ever seen
    (including me). It wasn't just a big disappointment for the real blind
    people but also to everyone that can see. Two long hours, no
    explanation on how they got blind or how they got their vision back. A
    lot of bad taste violent scenes for nothing.

    cmwm06 from Brazil - 11 June 2009
  • Good Moral story

    This is a very powerful, different and darkly disturbing film. As the
    film progresses it is quite horrifying to see how society breaks down
    and primeval instincts take hold (especially in the men), showing that
    the world really could not cope if a loss of one of the 5 senses were
    to take a sudden and inexplicable hold over the population. It also
    depicts fear of the highest order, again showing that fear of the
    unknown is the first response whether it be appropriate or not. The
    actors were amazing and, as I work with blind people, were truly
    realistic. It also proves an excellent opportunity to highlight
    disability and I hope that everyone who watches this film will feel
    compelled to try being blind for a day by wearing a blindfold and see
    how hard life is. By doing this the world would become more tolerant of
    disability as it can happen to anyone at any time.

    Scott Nichol (yocca_98@yahoo.com) from London,UK - 6 June 2009
  • Shocking for the wrong reasons

    First, I have to admit that I haven't read the book. Everyone says it's
    great, and that may be. However, "Blindness" the movie is… well… I
    don't know. I really, really don't know.I'm pretty sure there was some pretty strong and important symbolic in
    there. I didn't see it, though. Or maybe it's so simple I just
    dismissed it. I don't know. As some critics will be more than happy to
    tell you: "this is a movie for people with superior intelligence only".
    Okay, well… good for you.For my part, I'd rather just say it's an empty, yet very frustrating
    movie. I gave it a 3/10 because it will make you react in some way, so
    it achieves its goal: provocation. However, it will only make you react
    because some scenes and parts of the story are revolting and gruesome.
    Any movie could do that. It's like psychological torture porn. Oh, and
    some actual torture porn, too (you don't see a lot, but it's all the
    same).Was this movie supposed to point out that society is fragile and can
    easily be devoured by chaos? Was it supposed to say that, deep inside,
    we're nothing but violent animals? Was it supposed to be a metaphor of
    some kind about… something? Whatever "Blindness" is supposed to point
    out, it fails. Because in this movie, nothing makes any sense.The infected (blind) are treated like terrorists after two days without
    being treated at all (even though they can be touched by soldiers in
    Hazmat suits, apparently), the quarantined building looks like a
    concentration camp right from the start, the heroine can see but might
    as well be blind (except that she finally does what any sane person
    would have long done… so her initial inaction is pointless). None of
    this makes any sense. So it must be a metaphor. For something. Yet, it
    remains unclear. This movie has one clear goal only: to shock you. In a
    very unpleasant way.Now, people will tell you the rape scenes are revolting and disgusting.
    And yes, they are. They are unbearable to watch. But, worst of all,
    they're completely uncalled for and gratuitous, since the movie doesn't
    make any sense. Anyone with some instinct of survival (who, also, could
    see) would have tried to fight back (blind men) instead of being
    voluntarily raped (by blind men). It doesn't depict human nature at
    all, no matter what anyone might say. You don't have to be a superhero
    to fight back in a situation like that, even if you're scared to death.
    So, here again, there must be some hidden meaning. Very, very hidden. I
    just didn't care anymore, I guess. There are other ways to make a
    point, whatever it was.A lot will say that I'm missing the point. That's exactly it. I'm
    missing the point. Totally. If that movie is a metaphor of some kind
    for our own existence, why does it depict a world and characters that
    make no sense at all? I just didn't relate to anything or anyone in
    this movie. Or maybe that was the actual point. Who knows? Maybe the
    book makes more sense. I sure hope so. As for the movie, I still think
    it's mainly an excuse for provocation. That's how I feel after seeing
    it: shocked, yet empty.

    dazz_hero from Quebec - 2 June 2009

Pages: [41] 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 311 » Show All

Leave your Impressions!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>