Open Range



Downloads:

Download in DVD format ($4.99) Download in DivX format ($2.99) Download in PDA format ($1.99) Download in 1080p format ($4.99) 

Download Open Range movie

Attention!
Today you can get access to all our movies only for $0.99 per day.
Create free account and make sure that it is true.

Robert Duvall Boss Spearman
Kevin Costner Charley Waite
Annette Bening Sue Barlow
Michael Gambon Denton Baxter
Michael Jeter Percy
Diego Luna Button
James Russo Sheriff Poole
Abraham Benrubi Mose
Dean McDermott Doc Barlow
Kim Coates Butler
Herb Kohler Cafe Man
Peter MacNeill Mack
Cliff Saunders Ralph
Patricia Stutz Ralph's Wife
Julian Richings Wylie

Plot Keywords: 
Taglines: 
1: No place to run. No reason to hide.
2: No place to run. No reason to hide.
3: No place to run. No reason to hide.
4: No place to run. No reason to hide.

450 Comments »

    Pages: [90] 89 88 87 86 85 84 83 82 81 801 » Show All

  • Mostly great but almost painfully earnest in parts

    I'd heard great things about this film and for the most part I wasn't
    let down when I finally got around to seeing it. I think that Costner
    is capable of great things and, although I've not seen the reputedly
    awful The Postman, I'm one of the few people I know who rates
    Waterworld as being a decent flick. The film works because of the great
    scenes between Duvall and Costner's characters - some of the dialogue
    is really quite poetic and very well written. The corrupt rancher,
    played by Michael Gambon, as well as his right-hand man possibly aren't
    as menacing as other western baddies that I could think of. This is
    mostly due to the fact that they hardly feature in the film as opposed
    to poor acting on their part; they don't get enough screen time to
    establish much of a presence at all. Annette Benning is the other major
    character and she's really good. The love story between her and Costner
    plays out in a very quiet and dignified way. Benning is really
    gorgeous, too! There's a tone of almost painful sincerity and
    earnestness that underpins certain scenes and I put this down to
    Costner wanting the film to have the old school western feel. The
    relatively long build-up to the final showdown is also very much in
    keeping with the traditional western film format. So, much better than
    the 'Assassination of Jesse James' but maybe not quite as enjoyable as
    '3:10 to Yuma'.

    rumbleinthejungle from New Zealand - 20 June 2009
  • Excellent character-driven film

    Just about the time I thought that Hollywood had run out of original
    ideas, Kevin Costner wheeled this puppy out and proved me wrong. This
    film is way above average in many departments including the direction
    by Costner. The actors all turn in wonderful performances, even the
    ones with bit parts. The true joy of this film, however, is the
    writing. It is a very tight script that avoids so many common
    pitfalls.; the dialogue is believable, there are no b.s. subplots and
    the flow of the storytelling is right on. The audience gets to know the
    characters through the story itself without it beating us over the
    heads with cliché'-ridden monologues. I put this film in the same ranking as "Pale Rider", "The Outlaw Josey
    Wales" and "Unforgiven", three of the best westerns ever made. The
    characters stayed 'in character', their motivations were believable and
    their actions all made sense. It takes a real pro to make an
    entertaining film with virtually no special effects, no car chases and
    no gratuitous sex. I wish that more film makers would focus on good
    storytelling and only use CGI to further the story instead of relying
    on it to 'wow' the audience whilst letting the plot a a back seat.
    Kudos to Costner and company for an instant classic!!

    mcw2112 from Alaska, United States - 30 March 2009
  • A great example what is western supposed to be

    In my life, I watched many westerns, especially the old ones from 60's
    and 70's. Those westerns were (and always will be) way better than the
    most of the modern ones. Westerns made in the last, let's say 20 years,
    very often give big advantage to the style over substance. And
    unfortunately, there isn't too many of them made these days because
    everybody are looking for some big budget action spectacles. And if
    there still weren't movies like Open Range, Jack Bull, 3:10 to Yuma, or
    that great show Deadwood, I guess we could really say that western is
    dead.After mediocre Postman, in this movie Costner showed us that he can
    still direct and act in a movie as good as his previous Dance with the
    Wolves. This western has everything needful to make an Oscar worth
    film. Everything is great, especially the last gunfight. I can tell
    that this is, without a doubt, one of the best shootouts I've seen in
    my whole life. It looks really realistic and without exaggerations that
    are synonym for todays movies. I couldn't find any objection to the
    movie and I really doubt I ever will (more or less because I watched
    this movie 2 or 3 times already :). It's a beautiful dedication to the
    old westerns and all I can say is : Thank you for that, K. Costner.

    Tomici from Croatia - 11 February 2009
  • Reproduction Western

    OPEN RANGE is like a piece of good reproduction furniture– you've seen
    it before, but the vintage one fell apart when you sat on it. This time
    the photography and editing and sound and so on are so good that you
    can ignore the old-school dialogue and still follow the satisfyingly
    conventional story without any trouble. And it's fun to see an
    old-school Western (though they all do this now) with proper period
    costumes, hair, furniture, lamps, vehicles, typefaces, muddy streets,
    misfiring weapons, etc., and also with women who don't wear eye liner
    and shadow. Like all of Costner's films, it's unexciting. There's
    nothing really mean-spirited in it, which also means there's also
    nothing really funny in it. But it's politically neutral, in the style
    of most of the big Westerns made since the '80s, being neither mythic
    nor agitated. Rather like Bill Clinton, it wants to do good yet sell
    tickets; the impulses cancel one another out, leaving only a highly
    entertaining show behind. Amen. And Costner had the sense this time
    around to stay out of the way and let Duvall do a lot of the work. It's
    as if he's finally accepted that he's never going to be Richard
    Widmark, let alone John Wayne. The man can't carry a movie in the big
    traditional way (ROBIN HOOD). He's good only when he's the man things
    just happen to.

    n_r_koch from Washington DC - 20 December 2008
  • Anent "classics" and the obverse . . .

    As someone who regards "Lonesome Dove" as THE template for the film
    genre known as "the western," and who, similarly, believes that "Broken
    Trail" was/is an exemplary coda to same, I find it, after belatedly
    watching "Open Range," absolutely astonishing, incredible?, that BOTH
    Robert Duvall AND Kevin Costner consider this sad effusion of cinematic
    cliché and stereotype worthy of their efforts, much less their
    effusions. Any honest "oater" that opens with baldfaced homilies to the
    likes of "Mose" and "Buttons," never mind the four-legged Tig, and then
    proceeds to exploit the superficialities of both Spearman and the
    born-again gunslinger hero should be ashamed to do ought but collect
    the dollars at the box office. And that excruciatingly overlong and
    totally ersatz climactic "shootout" between the "good" guys and the
    varmints is just one more example of the bang-bang-you're-dead esthetic
    the prepubertal find orgasmic. Everyone's entitled to opinions and
    mistakes, but, in this case, this mistaken fan finds this pea-shooter
    out of range of consideration as plausible entertainment. "Classic"?
    You gotta be kidding.

    skyhouse5 from United States - 29 November 2008

Pages: [90] 89 88 87 86 85 84 83 82 81 801 » Show All

Leave your Impressions!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>