Slumdog Millionaire



Downloads:

Download in DivX format ($2.99) Download in iPod format ($1.99) Download in 1080p format ($4.99) Download in 1080p format ($4.99) 

Download Slumdog Millionaire movie

Attention!
Today you can get access to all our movies only for $0.99 per day.
Create free account and make sure that it is true.

Imran Hasnee Security
Anil Kapoor Prem Kumar
Irfan Khan Police Inspector
Dev Patel Jamal Malik
Anand Tiwari Newscaster
Mia Drake Adele
Freida Pinto Latika
Shruti Seth Call Centre teacher

787 Comments »

    Pages: « 158 157 156 [155] 154 153 152 151 150 149 1481 » Show All

  • Slumdog is seriously overrated

    Now the Oscar dust has settled, what remains of Slumdog Millionaire?
    Nothing much. Slumdog was a victim of its own buzz and the hype that
    surrounded it was, naturally, unsustainable. Watching the film on DVD,
    I was aware of its severe limitations as a cinematic experience.
    Originally intended for a DVD/TV crossover, the film very much belongs
    to that genre. The biggest problem of the film is its adult protagonist
    played by Dev Patel. For UK viewers, he is best known as one of the
    ex-cast members of the overrated teen drama Skins, and it's this TV
    baggage he brings to Slumdog. Furthermore, he is not the charismatic
    hero of Bollywood film but very average looking and limited in his
    acting talents. His co-star Freida Pinto as the adult Latika doesn't
    have to do much except look beautiful, and she does that very well.
    Embarrassingly, both are upstaged by the trio of child actors who bring
    a daring self-effacement to their roles. Is is they who bring a
    haunting authenticity to the film, being slumdog children themselves;
    and it's this blurring of roles and reality that is so intriguing.Why is it overrated? The film's central conceit of the Millionaire quiz
    and flashbacks is clever at the start but soon loses its effect.
    Director Danny Boyle is confused about where to reveal the origin of
    the answer – sometimes it's revealed after the question is asked; other
    times it's revealed before. There's an inconsistency about the flow of
    this narrative strategy and often I found myself guessing the outcome
    before it came and I don't want to be in this situation in a film. The film's dynamic flow staggers midway and the linear narrative takes
    hold. What we get is a run-of-the mill Bollywood romance that seems too
    Hollywood for its own sake. The final scenes are desperately out of
    place in the film and seem insulting to the audience following many
    harrowing scenes. To say the film's ending is badly handled is an
    understatement. Boyle seems to have been confused about how to end the
    film, so what we get is an abrupt cutaway to the protagonist Jamal,
    sitting like a beggar in the station despite being the most famous TV
    star in Mumbai. Just didn't ring true. The Bollywood credits further
    reinforces the trivial tone. No wonder it won so many Oscars!

    howie73 - 15 June 2009
  • One of the best movies this year!

    After seeing so many movies in my life, I'm the owner of a video-rental
    store for 25 years, it's hard to be thrilled by another movie. This one
    did. I can fully understand why it got the Oscar for best movie and I
    was impressed by the sound quality (DVD) too, for what it earned
    another Oscar. The story is original, the images impressive and the
    cutting of the movie more than excellent. I can't understand how
    children can act so good in movies like this one (and others). When
    seeing more then 40 movies a month it's exiting to find another gem in
    this business. There are of course many good movies these days that
    give enjoyment enough while watching it, but when I'm touched and moved
    by one I know it's one out of thousands. I can write so much more about
    this movie but want to add only that I will advise this movie to most
    of my customers. I CANNOT BELIEVE MORE THEN 1000 VOTERS GAVE THIS MOVIE
    A 1. There must be something wrong with you…

    tvoorbij-1 from Netherlands - 14 June 2009
  • enjoyable if occasionally outlandish melodrama

    Winner of eight Academy Awards, including one for Best Picture of 2008,
    "Slumdog Millionaire" is like a Charles Dickens story updated to the
    techno-savvy 21st Century. The movie focuses on a trio of impoverished
    orphans living and loving and contending with a slew of heartless
    villains in the slums of Mumbai, India. Jamal, his older brother,
    Salim, and their compatriot, Latika, a young girl they take under their
    wing, undergo enormous trials and tribulations as they struggle to
    survive in a world that has pretty much abandoned them to the vagaries
    of fate. In true Dickensian fashion, the story also provides generous
    doses of melodrama, implausible coincidences, hairbreadth escapes and
    heart-tugging sentimentality to help mitigate the suffering.Based on the novel "Q & A" by Vikas Swarup, the movie starts off with a
    now 18-year-old Jamal being interrogated - and, indeed, tortured - by
    the Indian authorities who don't believe that an ordinary kid from the
    slums could be racking up so much money as a contestant on "Who Wants
    to Be A Millionaire?" (he's fast approaching the 20,000,000 rupee mark)
    without somehow cheating. With this unlikely but clever narrative
    device serving as a framework, the movie then travels back in time to
    show the skeptical police investigator just how it is that Jamal does
    indeed happen to know the answers to all those questions.Written by Simon Beaufoy and co-directed by Loveleen Tandan and Danny
    Boyle ("Trainspotting," "28 Days Later"), "Slumdog Millionaire" somehow
    manages to push the envelope in the areas of plausibility and
    credibility without sacrificing its authenticity in the process. One
    moment it may be being brutally honest in its depiction of the effects
    of grinding poverty and cruelty on the human body and spirit - and the
    next it's indulging in the veriest of feel-good fantasies, as Jamal
    stands on the brink of the ultimate rags-to-riches fable, getting both
    the money and the girl, in the best Horatio Algers tradition. Yet, the
    movie never feels exploitative or compromised as a result of this
    dichotomy - a dichotomy, in fact, that clearly reflects the Indian
    culture of both wealth and poverty, traditionalism and modernity from
    which the story arises.The flashiness of the editing and the liveliness of the directing keep
    the film hurtling ahead at a breakneck pace, while the cast of mainly
    amateur actors - playing the children at various ages - engages our
    sympathy from the outset. Dev Patel and the gorgeous Freida Pinto are
    both splendid as the oldest incarnations of the two main characters.
    And don't step out before the closing credits, a fun and lively bit of
    Bollywood hoopla designed to send audiences out of the theater with a
    spring in their steps and a smile on their faces - a smile that is well
    and honestly earned, I must say.

    Roland E. Zwick (magneteach@aol.com) from United States - 14 June 2009
  • Slam Dunk Millionaire

    Beautifully shot and composed, this fast moving tale is also very
    well-acted by players unfamiliar to Americans. Distilled, the script is
    patently simple and has been done many times. But, it is the treatment
    here that makes SM different and compelling. Danny Boyle handles his
    directing chores to turn in a tightly woven story of
    rags-to-rags-to-riches.The child actors are wonderful and expressive. The adult Jamal, played
    by Dev Patel, comes off a little wooden. Freida Pinto as the adult
    Latika does a bit better, but all she is really asked to do is look
    beautiful, which she does effortlessly.This movie is relentlessly depressing, living in a world of a nearly
    sub-human subsistence struggle. India is presented as a filthy,
    corrupt, and thoroughly disgusting place; one spends much of the movie
    thanking God for allowing you to not have been born there. There is the
    occasional inappropriate background song. And there are some elements
    that simply do not work, such as the child diving into a pit of
    excrement and then obtaining a celebrity's autograph. For these things,
    I gave it nine rather than ten stars.Well worth a viewing.

    (j.lacerra@yahoo.com) from Philadelphia - 13 June 2009
  • Overrated

    It was pretty good, but the critics seemed to overrate it a bit. It
    just seems that every arty, substantial movie that gets made are sure
    to win Oscars. The cinematography and direction was great, but the
    story and characters was mediocre as the character development was
    ridiculous since the movie doesn't really show why Jamal loved Latika
    (let's not forget that he saw her only twice since they were kids).
    This was more of an obsession than real love. The only character that
    wasn't that two dimensional was Salim. Best directing and
    cinematography? Maybe, but the fact that the movie won best writing and
    movie is laughable. Also the little kid actors were awesome and other
    than that, there were better films released in 08.And are we really supposed to believe that playing for such high stakes
    on Who Wants To Be A Millionaire, they would ask a cricket related
    question, in India of all places?

    mmapwDotCom from United Kingdom - 11 June 2009

Pages: « 158 157 156 [155] 154 153 152 151 150 149 1481 » Show All

Leave your Impressions!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>