The Zodiac



Downloads:

Download in 1080p format  Download in DivX format  Download in iPod format  

Attention!
Today you can get access to all our movies only for $0.99 per day.
Create free account and make sure that it is true.

Justin Chambers Inspector Matt Parish
Robin Tunney Laura Parish
Rory Culkin Johnny Parish
William Mapother Dale Coverling
Brad William Henke Bill Gregory
Rex Linn Jim Martinez
Philip Baker Hall Frank Perkins
Marty Lindsey Zodiac Killer
Brian Bloom Voice of Zodiac
Shelby Alexis Irey Bobbie
Natassia Costa Mary
Kris Palm Michael
Nate Dushku Scott Washington
Katelin Chesna Patsy
Kathryn Howell Mrs. Boucher

Plot Keywords: 
Taglines: 
1: The most infamous serial killer of our time... is still out there.
2: The most infamous serial killer of our time... is still out there.
3: The most infamous serial killer of our time... is still out there.
4: The most infamous serial killer of our time... is still out there.

45 Comments »

    Pages: [9] 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 »

  • Flat !

    True that the Zodiac's case is bigger, but this one handled it, or
    rather handled its beginning, well as a small thriller, yet sorrowfully
    it looked more like the movie of the week (yet with higher directing),
    or a pilot for a next never-seen mini-series ! And with the lack of
    some points it looked, at its worst, as a Docu-drama.The movie cared much about the crimes' exact dates so the Zodiac more
    than caring about the police officer who's after him so his family. It
    could've been better and deeper if this script gave more concern for
    the characters. For instance why this officer is so confused and
    obsessed; is he a work-addict?, feeling a certain threat to his
    manhood?, just wants to assure his intelligent?,.. to the end of
    answers for the question that this movie never asked. The character's
    development was vague since originally the character itself was flat.
    So when I felt the overacting at one point I blamed the script firstly
    more than the young cast.Speaking of which the child actor who played the officer's son seemed
    too eccentric as if he plays an autistic ! This inanimate look and
    performance weren't for the sake of the character as simply a bright
    kid who wants to end his fear and also communicate with his father
    through the only subject he interested in, though this
    he-swallowed-too-much-starch kind of status made that kid just a weirdo
    who looks like someone would turn into a Zodiac himself !, not to
    mention so many boring scenes for him at his father's office that led
    eventually to nothing!. Remember the scene in which his mom finds the
    astronomy's papers under his bed; the funny acting and the non-writing
    managed to deliver a real overdone scene to a laughable extent, like
    the mom found a homosexual magazines under her teen son's bed or
    something !? To ask tearful in great agitation : "Do you wanna talk
    about it ??!!".The consecutive flashy stock footages didn't show but the usual clichés
    in any movie deals with the late-1960s' America, besides the natural
    chronicling for the movie's era, they wouldn't even try to generalize
    something deep out of that to refer to respectable conclusions else
    hollow common ones such as "this society became madly violent" without
    pinpointing to reasons or roots or anything.This movie seems to succeed in 2 points; firstly that touch of the
    political satire near the end when the police is after the black people
    asking the killer himself about that "Negro" they chase. It's a clever
    moment that could refer to how the American police was all along after
    the wrong, or the wronged, people. But as a matter of fact racism
    wasn't the main reason of how that murder psycho who killed 37 persons
    during a whole decade got away with it!. Yes, it was some bitter irony
    that may explain the Zodiac's prosperity at the late 1960s, though in
    rethinking, it could've been better if that was built correctly as a
    commentary from the start.The other possible good point of this movie is when it presents the
    police officer chasing the criminal on his own like a lone ranger, so
    this one-hero sort of dealing wasn't right, which drove him lastly to
    fail (it nearly drove him nuts !). I consider that some satire against
    the cow-boy's style or method. It could be the movie's suggestion to
    answer the most disgraceful question in the history of the American
    police : why the Zodiac is never been caught ? At least at this early
    period.So as a thriller it's another average one, and disappointing as well
    considering sad end where the mad killer wins !. And as a documentary
    it's watchable yet still its main problem is that it shows only and not
    trying seriously to explore. Therefore it's nothing but the movie of
    the week, which means that you wouldn't need it, nor lose catching
    anything important in it, if you already read its events before !

    ahmed elshikh (ahmed_abd_elreheem@yahoo.com) from Egypt - 4 January 2009
  • embarrassed by some comments

    The film was nothing short of fantastic. In reading several comments on
    this site, there was an overwhelming feeling of disappointment. The
    disappointment was not in reference to the film, but to those who so
    fool-heartedly badmouthed the film. I was not expecting that much from
    Zodiac for a couple of reasons. First, serial killer movies are almost
    always terrible. Second, movies that are supposedly based on actual
    events are almost always terrible. This film dodges both of these
    generalizations and is, in my opinion, possibly the best film of 2007.
    Not only is the direction and photography fantastic, the script is more
    concise than almost any I have come across. If you are interested in
    the Zodiac killer and wanted a film that would stick closely to the
    actual events of the case, then this film will not disappoint. It is
    extremely accurate and attentive to detail for a Hollywood film. All of
    the 'flaws' that were pointed out were almost laughably stupid. "It was
    too long." "The ending is bad." I actually read a comment that said
    that this film lacked emotion by the actors and should look to Brad
    Pitt as an example. Of course the film was long! It was an
    investigation that ruined lives for a decade! Of course there was no
    climactic ending! The case remains open. It is the subtle details that
    make the film special. The fact that you just sat through 160 minutes
    (wow. thats almost an eternity!) and did not get to find out who the
    killer was says something. If you are frustrated and annoyed, then the
    film just showed its strength. The frustration and obsession to get
    some closure parallels that of the story. Imagine Graysmith and Toschi;
    30 years have gone by and they never got closure.

    taybaca from United States - 6 February 2008
  • Cheap Rip-Off of Fincher's movie

    'Straight to DVD' is a phrase which can arouse unfair prejudice towards
    a film. Not in this case. A truly awful film, created only to steal
    profits from the real movie. Honestly, I think films deliberately
    setting out to be confused with other films should be banned. That
    said, if someone is stupid enough to buy one of these DVDs, they're
    probably going to enjoy the film more than the masterpiece it imitates.
    Like Forrest Gump*.If you agree with me, in disapproval of imitations like this of Zodiac,
    and those of films like 300 as well, please click 'helpful'. We must
    raise awareness. Where better to start than at the IMDb pages for a
    ripoff of a masterpiece.* You do not have to agree with me on Forrest Gump to click 'helpful'.
    The Hanks flick aside, we should make sure the vast majority know of
    these cheap rip-offs. Then they might not need be made illegal.

    wolverinerage from United Kingdom - 3 February 2008
  • Better as an episode of Criminal Minds

    THE ZODIAC takes a different look at the famous Zodiac Killer case from
    other screen treatments of the murders. More than a simple crime story,
    the film is an emotional thriller focusing on the murders' impact on
    victims, their families and the wider community. The film follows a
    police detective (Chambers) from "Grey's Anatomy", and his son (Culkin)
    who become obsessed with the murders and endanger their family in the
    process.This movie also stars other TV show stars of current drama, such as
    Robin Tunney from "Prison Break", William Mapother from "Lost", Rex
    Linn from "CSI: Miami", and Philip Baker Hall from "The Loop".What touches me most perhaps is that it took place in the town I grew
    up, The Bay Area of California. Sure, it happened long before I was
    born, but the fact he was never caught is haunting to a child, whose
    imagination reinvents in timeless fashion the monsters of yesterday's
    endless mysteries.Chambers plays a detective who is in over his head. Perhaps if the FBI
    were more involved early on he might have been caught… I guess we'll
    never know.A film with decent acting, pacing, music, overall feel is like those
    suspenseful thrillers I used to see as a kid on TV, and I always
    enjoyed that personable feeling, almost like no one is in character but
    just feeling out the story that stays true to the real life mystery we
    were all left with in the reality of The Zodiac.My rating: 6.5 because it failed to draw the characters in, sadly so
    little was ever discovered about the Zodiac that there wasn't a lot to
    go on going into the picture and that hole is painfully clear in the
    end result. Every subplot to the film is a dead end, mirroring the
    investigation. We see several times how easily the Zodiac eluded
    capture due to the ignorance and incompetence of the police.

    Kupotek from United States - 28 January 2008
  • If properly edited, 22 minutes max

    A clip-art movie. The only scenes with any motion to speak of are
    newsreel shots of the Viet Nam war. A cast of excellent veteran actors,
    but all scenes appeared to be first takes or even rehearsals. The
    editor must have gone loopy for lack of footage to tell the story. Sort
    of as if Ed Wood had been given a budget based on the the cast, payed
    the actors (maybe), skipped the story board, wrote the script himself,
    went with one-take "emoting heads" and stock footage and pocketed the
    savings for partying. I imagine that the cast had to bring their own
    lunches. In short, I think the production was out of balance. But, I guess it
    sometimes takes a name-brand cast to get any investors at all.Perhaps it's a prank homage to "Manos, Hands of Fate" from the producer
    of "Robot Chicken" and "Moral Orel".Kudos to the antique car wranglers.

    pburrisk from Northampton, Massachusetts, USA - 28 December 2007

Pages: [9] 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 »

Leave your Impressions!

You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>